Search Box

Search This Blog

Friday, August 14, 2015

U.S. Analyst: 'Thunder without lightning: high cost and limited benefit development program of F-35'.


U.S. Analyst: 'Thunder without lightning: high cost and limited benefit development program of F-35'. (Sputnik).

In light of that, analyst Bill French wrote a report titled “Thunder without lightning: high cost and limited benefit development program of F-35,” reviewing the new aircraft.
The document states that according to the technical parameters the F-35 is “losing to the fourth-generation fighter MiG-29 and Su-27, developed by the Russian Air Force and used around the world.”
The Soviet MiG-29 and Su-27 fighter aircraft are superior in technical performance than the new US fighter aircraft F-35. The conclusion was reached by the American analyst Bill French, working for a non-profit organization National Security Network.

The F-35 is significantly inferior to the Russian Su-27 and MiG-29 in regard to wing loading (exception — F35C), acceleration and thrust-weight ratio (the ratio of thrust to weight of the aircraft),” said the analyst.

Besides, all of the F-35s have significantly lower maximum speed as compared to the Soviet Union aircrafts.

Mr. French also deliberated that in a simulation of air combat, the results draw even “grimmer picture.”

According to him, in 2009 the analysts of US Air Force Intelligence and the Lockheed Martin Company, which developed the new American fighter, noted that despite the superiority of the F-35 in regard to stealth technology and avionics, if compared to the Su-27 and MiG —29 the loss ratio is to be expected 3: 1. That is, for each destroyed Su-27 or MiG-29 there would be three F-35 destroyed.

Also, in a real educational dogfight, a veteran in a US Air Force F-16 easily won over the F-35. Hmmmm.....The only good news is that 'Sometimes NATO Ally' Turkey will buy 100 of these white elephants. Read the full story here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...