Overnight music video - Love potion number 9, The Searchers

Solyndra Fiasco - "All the Choices We've Made Have Been the Right Ones"

Dubai Police Chief Dahi Khalfan Tamim: US Policy Is the Number One Threat to the Gulf States; 'Is Now Embracing' the Muslim Brotherhood, and 'Is No Longer An Ally'.

Dubai Police Chief Dahi Khalfan Tamim: 'U.S.Policy Is the No. 1 Security Threat' to the Gulf States; America Has 'Realized the Dreams Of Iran' in Iraq, 'Is Now Embracing' the Muslim Brotherhood, and 'Is No Longer An Ally'.





In a January 19, 2012 address at the GCC national and regional security conference in Bahrain, Dubai's longtime chief of police Dahi Khalfan Tamim gave an assessment of security threats to the Gulf states. He said that the U.S. was the main security threat, had realized Iran's dreams in Iraq, was "embracing" the Muslim Brotherhood, and was no longer an ally. His remarks prompted U.S. Ambassador to Bahrain Thomas Krajeski, who was attending the conference, to walk out.

The day following the address, he defended his statements, saying, "The U.S. has granted Iran many of its dreams in the region, including the toppling of Saddam [Hussein], active presence of Iran in Iraq and the exporting of the revolution into the Arab world." He added, "I was not solely targeting the U.S. policies but was giving my reading to the security threats to the Gulf, and they included several factors. I talked about corruption and abuse of power, especially in law enforcement apparatus, on Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood as well."

Tamim, who has been in his post since 1980, is credited with keeping Dubai one of the safest cities in the world, complete with extensive video surveillance. Dubai police officers have received training from the FBI and other leading agencies.
Dahi Khalfan Tamim: "Allow me to avoid diplomatic language. I am not a diplomat. I am a security official, and I will talk about the domestic and foreign security threats. My words might be embarrassing to people home and abroad, but I have come to this conference in order to say what I feel as a security official. With no further ado, I will try to present to you 38 different threats to the security of the Gulf.
"Let me begin with threat number one. In my opinion, U.S. policy in the region is the number one security threat. Our American friends might not like this, but experience has taught us that the Americans do not have friends. On the contrary, they are quick to wash their hands of their friends.

"Therefore, U.S. policy in the Gulf constitutes a threat, because they have ulterior motives: to overthrow the regimes. In the past, they used to talk about imposing democracy, but when they failed in their efforts to impose it on Iraq and Afghanistan, they took a new tack – to export the revolution. They adopted the path and ideology of Khomeini. They embraced the same idea, and began to export the revolution.
"It is not me who says this, but American writers and thinkers say so themselves. They say: We are exporting the revolution to the Arab world. If their aim is indeed to export the revolution, they subscribe to the same mentality as Khomeini."
"Bringing new regimes to power is in keeping with the American doctrine regarding the transition of power. It began in Tunisia, was exported to Egypt, and from there to Libya, to Yemen, and now to Syria – and who will be next? That is the reality of things."
"Wherever the Muslim Brotherhood are to be found in the Gulf states, they will grow stronger and will become... They are already talking about this, and therefore, they are of concern to us. America is now embracing them.
Foreign interference into Gulf affairs [poses another threat]. When the Iranian public took to the streets, the people were trodden on, crushed, beaten, and thrown into prison, but when the public in the Gulf took action, [the Iranians said]: 'No, that's a good thing. We welcome this.' Look at this paradox, at this difference in mentality. You think it is ok for my public to revolt against me, but you do not accept it when your public revolts against you. That's peculiar.
So Iran interferes [in our affairs] – and not just from today. I am an officer who has been in security for 42 years. Iran interferes not only in the affairs of Bahrain, but in the affairs of all Gulf states. We must be realistic, people.
The 11th threat is that some Gulf regimes support and embrace extremist Islamic movements. That's right. Some Gulf states support extremists. "Every Gulf state that embraces Salafis, Shiites, Muslim Brotherhood members, or members of any other Islamist organization – these organizations will turn against them and bite off the hand that fed them. Efforts have been made with these organizations in the past, and the Gulf states have given them everything they needed, but ultimately, they turned against whoever cooperated with them. I ask all the Gulf states not to accept Islamist organizations as governments. [...]
"America is no longer an ally. On the contrary, it has become an intimidating party. Get that into your heads, weigh it, and you will see. Russia has become a capitalist country, so why can't it become a new ally? The Americans used to scare us by saying that the Russians are Communists, but now Communism is gone. But now they have become more capitalist than the capitalists.
"We must reach an agreement with the Russians, and form ties with them. Think about it, and you will see."China is a friend from whom we have only seen good things throughout history, so why shouldn't we strengthen our ties with it?"Source : Memri.

Egypt - Port Said. Soccer Match results in 73 people dead and hundreds injured as supporters of rival teams clash

Egypt - Port Said. Soccer Match results in 73 people dead and hundreds injured as supporters of rival teams clash.(Al-Jazeera).(BikyaMasr).At least 73 people have been killed in clashes after a football game in the northern Egyptian city of Port Said, medics say.About 1,000 others were injured in Wednesday's violence, including police. At least two players suffered light injuries.Fans of the winning al-Masry team flooded the field seconds after the match with al-Ahly, Egypt's top team, was over.A security official said the fans chased the players and cornered their supporters on the field and around the stadium,throwing stones and bottles at them.
Thousands of supporters covered the field, as seen in the video."This is unfortunate and deeply saddening. It is the biggest disaster in Egypt's soccer history," Hesham Sheiha, deputy health minister, said.He said most of the injuries were caused by concussion and deep cuts.
Al-Ahly football players were trapped in the changing room along with supporters. Riot police were sent in to drive the rival crowds of fans back.
Field Marshal Mohamed Hussein Tantawi, the head of Egypt's ruling military council, sent army helicopters to transfer al-Ahly football players and injured fans from Port Said.
Private cars helped to shuttle the injured across the city to hospitals."This is not football. This is a war and people are dying in front of us. There is no movement and no security and no
ambulances," al-Ahly player Abo Treika told the team's television channel."This is a horrible situation and today can never be forgotten."State television announced that parliament will hold an emergency session over the violence. State prosecutors ordered an investigation into the pitch invasion and the violence that ensued.The Muslim Brotherhood, the country's largest political force, accused supporters of the toppled president, Hosni Mubarak, of instigating the violence."The events in Port Said are planned and are a message from the remnants of the former regime," Essam al-Erian, a parliamentarian, said in a statement on the group's Freedom and Justice Party website.
Al-Ahly's supporter club, Ultras, said on their website that they would head to Port Said later in the evening.Ahly players said that police and armed forces were nowhere to be seen during or after the clashes and rumors were that the al-Masry fans, who initiated the attack after the match, were allegedly preventing the ambulances from entering the stadium for an hour and half.
Some players were also injured during the attack.Egyptian football club al-Ahly issued a statement giving their condolences for the 73 people killed and the hundreds who were injured on Wednesday night following the club’s match in Port Said. The club also announced a three-day mourning period starting Thursday and the suspension of all athletic and sport activities at the club.“These events have no relations to sports especially after it evolved violently against the Ahly fans,” said the statement that was signed by Hassan Hamdy, the general manager of the club. They also announced they are filing a complaint at the Supreme Council for the Armed Forces (SCAF), the Egyptian parliament and the general prosecutor demanding an investigation into the violence,” the statement read.
The Ahly board is also scheduled to hold an emergency meeting.“We will not let these events pass by without bringing justice to the dead and their families,” the statement continued.
The team and their fans are now en route via planes to Cairo after the SCAF decided to send two military planes to evacuate them from the stadium after being locked inside for hours with the injured and dying.Read the full story here and here.

Iranian MP Hossein Ebrahimi: "The Persian Gulf Will Be Turned into a Graveyard" for International Forces

Iranian MP Hossein Ebrahimi, Deputy Head of the Iranian Parliament's National Security Committee: "The Persian Gulf Will Be Turned into a Graveyard" for International Forces .

Following are excerpts from an interview with Iranian MP Hossein Ebrahimi, deputy chairman of the Iranian parliament's National Security Committee. The interview aired on Al-Alam TV on January 24, 2012.

Hossein Ebrahimi: [Closing the Hormuz Strait] is the prerogative of the sacred regime of the Islamic Republic, in the event that our interests are threatened, and the export of Iranian oil is blocked. If we cannot export our oil, I expect that the oil of other countries will not pass through these waters either - especially not through the Hormuz Strait, because Iran controls it.
This is indeed one of the strategic plans of the Islamic Republic of Iran. We will not allow countries from all corners of the world to give orders to the countries of the Persian Gulf, thus jeopardizing our national interests. We will never let this happen. If we see that our national interests are in danger, and that the [West] is serious about disrupting the export of Iranian oil, we will jeopardize their interests as well, and they should know this.
If they undertake this measure, I personally believe that in addition to closing the Hormuz Strait, the Persian Gulf will be turned into a graveyard for the forces coming from all corners of the earth to this sensitive region. Source : Memri.

A Palestinian mufti and the U.S. election, then and now

The Jerusalem Grand Mufti Amin el Husseini and Reichs Fuhrer Himmler.

A Palestinian mufti and the U.S. election, then and now. (JTA).By Rafael Medoff .
WASHINGTON - A Palestinian mufti has called for violence against Jews, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is demanding Palestinian leaders disavow him and America's presidential race could be affected.That could be the lead sentence of a news report from last week.
Or from 1946.
Sixty-five years ago, another Palestinian mufti, another Netanyahu and another American presidential race likewise intersected in an unexpected round of high-stakes Middle East politics and diplomacy.
At the center of the current controversy is Sheik Muhammad Hussein, the mufti of Jerusalem, who is the Palestinian Authority's senior religious official. In a recent speech Hussein, citing a traditional Islamic text, urged Arabs to "fight and kill the Jews." Later he explained he was "only quoting the words of the Prophet Muhammad."In an American presidential election season, words like those can be explosive. The candidates for the Republican nomination have strongly condemned Palestinian incitement against Israel and criticized the Obama administration for not being more outspoken on the issue. The votes of Jews and pro-Israel evangelical Christians could be decisive in some battleground states in November.
"Whoever wants peace should not permit such incitement and should not allow calls to murder Jews," Prime Minister Netanyahu said, urging the Palestinian Authority to disavow the mufti's remarks.
He said that Hussein's "morally heinous" statements were reminiscent of one of his predecessors, the mufti Amin el-Husseini, who fled to Germany in 1941 and collaborated with the Nazis during the Holocaust. Husseini's pro-Nazi radio broadcasts were beamed from Berlin to the Arab world -- including a March 1, 1944 tirade in which he exhorted his listeners, in language similar to that of last week's controversy, to "Kill the Jews wherever you find them."What is not well known is the impact of the mufti on the 1948 U.S. presidential race.Read the full story here.


(Dr. Rafael Medoff is the director of The David S. Wyman Institute for Holocaust Studies and co-author, with Professor Sonja Schoepf Wentling, of "Herbert Hoover and the Jews: The Origins of the 'Jewish Vote' and Bipartisan Support for Israel," which will be published in April.)

Video - Michael Coren & Robert Spencer On Islam & The Shafia Honour Killings + Hamed Shafia files appeal in honour killing verdict.

Breaking - Hamed Shafia files appeal in honour killing verdict.(MontrealGazette).By Sheila Dabu Nonato.The trial that ended with Hamed Shafia behind bars for the murder of four members of his family was afflicted by media bias and hearsay evidence, says his lawyer — who confirmed Tuesday he is appealing his client's first-degree murder convictions.The 21-year-old and his parents — Mohammad Shafia, 58, and Tooba Mohammad Yahya, 42 — were each found guilty Sunday of four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Mohammad Shafia's three teenage daughters and his first wife in what the Crown successfully argued was an 'honour killing' inspired by the belief that the women had brought shame on the family.
Lawyer Patrick McCann said Tuesday that the appeal is based upon inadmissible hearsay evidence of key witnesses, including the sisters' boyfriends and teachers who recalled statements made to them by the sisters, as well as testimony from social workers, police, shelter workers, friends and others. McCann said this hearsay evidence should not have been heard by the jury."The ground relating to hearsay is based on evidentiary law, which prohibits the use of hearsay unless it is established that the words spoken would not likely be changed or modified by any cross-examination so that there are adequate substitutes for the absence of an oath and any cross-examination and the inability of the jury to observe the witness when testifying," he told Postmedia News in an email.
McCann also questioned the testimony of a University of Toronto "honour crimes" expert. In court, the defence criticized the testimony of Prof. Shahrzad Mojab, saying Mojab did not do any fieldwork in Afghanistan and that her observations were biased.
According to McCann, another aspect of the appeal is the potential negative impact of biased media coverage of the case."As you know, the media coverage was extremely intense . . . whereas much of it was quite objective, much of it assumed guilt from the beginning of the trial," he explained.Read the full story here.

Obama silent on 'Palestinian' television glorification of Fogel murderers

Obama silent on 'Palestinian' television glorification of Fogel murderers.(BigPeace).Jeff Dunetz makes a good point about President Obama's non-reaction to that television show, as compared with his reaction to announcements of Jerusalem apartment construction. Where is Mr. Friend of Israel, President Barack Obama? Why isn’t he condemning this glorification of a brutal act by the Government run by his buddy President Abbas? Palestinian State TV runs segments praising terrorists on a regular basis—but the US President and his Administration insists on criticizing Israel’s building of new housing units, saying, “this kind of activity is never helpful when it comes to peace negotiations.” Tell me, how many children had their throats slashed because of a new Israeli apartment in Jerusalem?
In striking contrast, the President has never issued a statement about the murder of the Fogel family and will likely continue his silence over Palestinian Authority TV’s praise of the perpetrators. Jewish voters who are reconsidering their votes for President Obama would do well to note where his priorities lie when condemning actions that are not “helpful when it comes to peace negotiations” in Israel.
Last week, the murderer Awad received praise and congratulations on the Palestinian state-run station called "For You," which focuses on Palestinian prisoners held in Israel. Awad's mother and aunt went on the air during the show. His mother said: "I send my blessings to my dearest Hakim, the apple of my eye." His mother then went on to express how proud she was that "he carried out the Itamar operation and was sentenced to five life sentences." His aunt also praised his actions and the show's presenter added: "We also wish them (murderers) well." Hmmmmm......."The good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and the evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For out of the overflow of his heart his mouth speaks." ~ Luke 6:45.Read the full story here.HT:IsraelMatzav.

MFS -The Other News - What the main papers don't say.

                    Morning Posting.

• Updated !Earthquakes in the last 24 hours in the world seismic activity situation Indonesia 5.6 - 5.4 ; Philippines 5.2 !More info here.

• Fast and Furious News: With Zero Hour Approaching, It’s Revealed the DOJ Suggested Gun Running.(Biggovernment).February 2nd is fast approaching for Attorney General Eric Holder, who is set to appear before the House Oversight Committee for questioning on Fast and Furious. This will put him in the hot seat in front of Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and other congressional members like Paul Gosar (R-AZ), who have been steady on Holder’s trail since details of Fast and Furious became public.Holder’s last appearance before a congressional committee was on December 8, when Issa made it clear how irritated he was over the changing timeline, Holder’s perceived arrogance, and the ongoing refusal to turn over subpoenaed DOJ documents. In one of the best exchanges on Dec 8, Issa looked at Holder and asked, “Have you no shame?” That was also the hearing in which Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI), expressed his outrage over the fact that Holder’s DOJ had submitted inaccurate testimony then withdrawn it in an attempt to avoid being charged with providing false testimony.But a lot has changed since that early December hearing. Most recently, the last minute release of subpoenaed documents which show that Holder learned about Border Agent Brian Terry’s death on the day it happened: a point Holder has heretofore denied. (Emails between Dennis Burke, former U.S. Attorney for Arizona, and Holder’s then-deputy chief of staff prove this.) Additionally, other emails in the recently released DOJ documents show that the head of DOJ’s “criminal division, Lanny Breuer, suggested letting some illicit ‘straw’ weapons buyers in the U.S. [to] transport their guns across the border into Mexico where they could be arrested.”In light of the emails, Holder needs to give a clear and binding answer regarding when he found out about Terry’s death. He needs to explain how the DOJ can claim ignorance regarding “gun running” while their own man, Lanny Breuer, was pushing it as a means making arrests. He needs to explain what, if any, interaction he or other DOJ officials/affiliates had with Patrick J. Cunningham between the time Cunningham was subpoenaed and the time his attorney announced he would plead the fifth. And he needs to describe what, if any, interaction he or other DOJ officials/affiliates have had with Michael Morrissey at this time regarding the testimony Morrissey is expected to give when he speaks with investigators.Read the full story here.

• 'Iran will be able to make nuclear bomb within a year'.(JPost).By Yaakov Katz."Iran is a global problem, a regional problem, and a problem for Israel," there is no doubt that Iran is working on developing a nuclear weapon, IDF Chief of Staff Gantz says at Herzliya Conference.The world needs to develop a credible military option to stop Iran’s nuclear program, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Benny Gantz said Wednesday, warning that if Iran wants to it has the ability to develop a nuclear weapon within 12 months.“Iran is a global problem, a regional problem and a problem for Israel. Iran wants to solidify its regime by creating a nuclear deterrent,” Gantz said in a speech at the Herziliya Conference. “Israel is the only country which someone calls for its destruction and is building the tools to do so.”Read the full story here.

• Clueless TSA agents found two possible pipe bombs at LaGuardia,kept them in a public area for six hours without notifying cops.(NYPost).Clueless TSA agents found two possible pipe bombs in a passenger’s luggage yesterday at La Guardia Airport — and kept them in a public area for six hours without notifying cops, The Post has learned.The Transportation Security Administration bozos at one point left the pipes — which eventually turned out to be harmless — resting on a radiator as hundreds of fliers passed through security nearby, sources said.“Six hours to report a potential bomb? It’s outrageous,” one Port Authority police official fumed.The stunning security screw-up, a violation of TSA policy of alerting police to all suspicious activity, began at about 11:30 a.m. at the central terminal when the male flier’s bags passed through an X-ray machine, the sources said.“When I saw the image, I took a step backward and said, ‘What’s that?!’ ” one startled TSA employee said, according to police sources.Another screener saw the objects, one gold, the other silver, and both 6-inches long with “springs” inside, and thought they could be bombs, the sources said. The screeners promptly called their supervisor. He questioned the passenger, who claimed the pipes were for homeopathic medicine.The supervisor bought the story and let the man board his flight without taking down any information, the sources said.The flier left the pipes behind and it wasn’t until 3 p.m., with the devices still lying around the screening area, when the supervisor finally realized he should notify someone.He called a TSA bomb specialist — who took another two hours to arrive.Hmmm...........Read the full story here.

• Darrell Issa threatens Eric Holder with contempt.(Politico).BY TimMak.House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) threatened Tuesday to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress if the Justice Department did not provide certain documents in response to the committee’s subpoena.In a letter to Holder, Issa wrote that “this committee will have no alternative but to move forward with proceedings to hold you in contempt of Congress” if Holder and the DOJ didn’t produce documents they demanded relating to the Fast and Furious gun-walking scandal.Holder has until Thursday, Feb. 9. to comply, according to Issa.Issa accused the Justice Department of trying to “obstruct our investigation and deceive the public” by withholding documents.“Your actions lead us to conclude that the department is actively engaged in a cover-up,” he said in a four-page letter.The California Republican pointed to a document that the DOJ released last Friday, which indicated that Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer had promoted gun-walking to Mexico on the same day that Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich wrote to Congress denying that the DOJ had allowed guns to walk.“It is inconceivable that the Department just became aware of this highly damaging document,” writes Issa, pointing out that the Oversight Committee had originally issued a subpoena on Oct. 12, 2011.Read the full story here.

• Grassley says Obama is behaving dictatorially, ‘usurping legislative powers’.(DC).Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley accused President Obama of dictatorial behavior in a floor statement Thursday, saying that his recess appointments were not the first acts he has taken to circumvent the constitutional system of checks and balances.“President Obama’s decision to bypass the constitutional advice and consent of the Senate is not an isolated incident,” Grassley said, according to prepared remarks. “It is merely the latest escalation in a pattern of contempt for the elected representatives of the American people and the constitutional separation of powers.”Grassley accused the president of “usurping legislative powers” by overriding and working around Congress when possible. This, Grassley argues, is in violation of the Constitution.“Having had their rights violated by a king, our Founding Fathers intentionally put the power to make laws in the branch of government that is most directly accountable to the citizens,” the Iowa senator said.Congress, Grassley said, needed to stop the president’s usurpation before it was too late.With this latest escalation, the time has come for Congress, on a bipartisan basis, to say ‘Enough is enough.’”“I would ask my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to think hard about the precedent being set for the next Republican president,” Grassley warned. “Once the genie is out of the bottle, you are not likely to be able to get it back in.”.read the full story here.

• Sen. Lee to Testify at Hearing on Illegal Non-Recess Appointments.(Heritage).A handful of constitutional law experts are slated to testify before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee tomorrow about President Obama’s four unconstitutional non-recess appointments. The witnesses include Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), one of Congress’ chief critics of Obama’s unprecedented decision. Lee will offer his expertise as a former clerk for a Supreme Court justice and attorney specializing in Supreme Court litigation. His testimony will come on the heels of a testy exchange with the president that began with the former’s announcement that he may block all of Obama’s nominations until the four illegally appointed officials make their way through the Senate confirmation process.“I find myself duty-bound to resist the consideration and approval of additional nominations until the president takes steps to remedy the situation,” Lee said at a House Judiciary Committee business meeting. “The president certainly will not continue to enjoy my nearly complete cooperation, unless and until he rescinds his unconstitutional recess appointments.”Obama fired back at Lee specifically, claiming, “One senator gumming up the works for the whole country is certainly not what our founding fathers envisioned.”That prompted a response from Lee, who rejected Obama’s accusations of political gamesmanship. “The Constitution is not partisan,” Lee wrote at the conservative blog RedState. “I will oppose any president, regardless of party, who attempts to ignore constitutional limits on executive power.”Lee’s objections will likely be fleshed out further at Wednesday’s hearing of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, titled “Uncharted Territory: What are the Consequences of President Obama’s Unprecedented ‘Recess’ Appointments?” Other witnesses include legal experts C. Boyden Gray, Andrew J. Pincus, Michael J. Gerhardt, David B. Rivkin and Mark A. Carter. The hearing will be streamed live on the committee’s website.While Lee has been the most outspoken opponent of the president’s power-grab among U.S. senators, others have hinted at similar tactics in response to the move. Speaking at The Heritage Foundation on Tuesday, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), while declining to endorse Lee’s tactics specifically, noted that “there are a number of people thinking, like Senator Lee, [that] we can no longer continue to work with this president and the other side in any form.”Read the full story here.

• Pro-Obama Think Tank: Only 35% of Deficit Is Bush’s Fault, 65% Obama.(Washington Examiner) — Most of the soaring $1 trillion federal deficit is the blame of President Obama’s spending and political deals according to a pro-Obama think tank that pegged former President George W. Bush’s responsibility at just 35 percent.While opening its analysis by blaming Bush and showing pictures of Senate GOP leaders, the Center for American Progress said that the other 65 percent of the deficit surge came on Obama’s watch, a combination of high spending, extension of the Bush tax cuts and additional defense spending.“The analysis reveals that events that occurred before January 2009, including the onset of the Great Recession and increased spending—especially on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq—attributed to 35 percent of the swing from surplus to deficit,” said the center founded by long-time Obama advisor John Podesta.“The remainder of the deterioration did happen after 2009, but mostly because of lower-than-expected revenues. While some of the decline in revenue resulted from the continued economic weakness, the majority of it, about $335 billion, is the direct result of the tax deal signed into law in December 2010, which extended all of the Bush tax cuts,” said the group.Read the full story here.

• Obama green jobs program faces further investigation.(USAToday).By Gregory Korte.WASHINGTON – House Republicans are expanding their probe into the Obama administration's energy programs, investigating $500 million in green job training grants that reached just 10% of its job-placement goal, according to a government report.The program's goal was to train 124,893 people and put 79,854 in jobs. But 17 months later, 52,762 were trained and 8,035, or roughly 1 in 10, had jobs. Those numbers come from an audit by the Department of Labor's inspector general, which recommended that the administration end the program and return unspent money.President Obama has made green jobs a cornerstone of his economic agenda. In his first 2012 campaign ad this month, he said clean energy industries created 2.7 million jobs and were "expanding rapidly." But Republicans have pounced on failures, such as the bankruptcy of Solyndra, a solar panel maker backed with a Department of Energy loan guarantee.Citing what he calls "abysmal results" in the job training program, House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., is demanding answers about how the Department of Labor awarded the grants, which were funded out of the 2009 stimulus bill.But Assistant Secretary of Labor Jane Oates defends the initiative, saying the inspector general's audit used old numbers and that it was never designed to provide immediate results.Read the full story here.

• GOP weighs contempt charges against White House on Solyndra.(TheHill).Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), who is heading the GOP probe of the failed solar company Solyndra, said Republicans are meeting this week to discuss contempt charges against the White House over its response to last year’s subpoena for documents.“We are meeting this week to look at a very serious charge, which would be contempt of Congress, because they are slow walking,” Stearns said on the Fox Business Network Monday, according to a transcript. Stearns leads the investigations panel of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.Republicans allege the White House has not provided enough internal documents to satisfy the GOP probe of Solyndra, the California solar panel manufacturer that received a $535 million Energy Department loan guarantee in 2009 and went bankrupt last year.White House officials say they have been responsive to the subpoena that Energy Committee Republicans issued in November, as well as earlier document requests. More on that here.Stearns, in the Fox segment, also took aim at David Axelrod, President Obama’s senior campaign strategist. Read the full story here.

• Obama Exploits Navy Seals.(DocsTalk).By Ed Lasky.For a basketball player, Barack Obama sure can stoop low.Leif Babin, a much-decorated Navy Seal, takes President Obama to task for exploiting Navy Seal operations to gain votes. This is not harmless credit-hogging by Barack Obama for the heroism and tough decision-making by our military. Babin -- joining a range of others -- writes in today's Wall Street Journal that Barack Obama is endangering the lives of Navy Seals for cheap political points: America's premier Special Operations force is once again in the headlines after a team of Navy SEALs rescued two hostages from captivity in Somalia last week. Elite U.S. forces have carried out such operations periodically over the past decade, always with skill and bravery. The difference in recent months is that the details of their work haven't remained secret. On the contrary, government officials have revealed them for political gain -- endangering our forces in the process.The floodgates opened after the raid that killed Osama bin Laden last May, and the Obama administration's lack of discretion was on display again at last week's State of the Union address. As President Obama entered the House chamber, in full view of the cameras, he pointed to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and exclaimed: "Good job tonight, good job tonight." Clearly something had happened that he wanted the world to know about.After delivering his speech, which included multiple references to the bin Laden raid, the president again thanked Mr. Panetta. "That was a good thing tonight," he said as if to ensure that the viewing public, if they missed it initially, would get it a second time around.Sure enough, shortly thereafter, the White House announced the successful rescue of the hostages in Somalia by U.S. Special Operations forces. Vice President Biden appeared on ABC's "Good Morning America" to highlight the success the next morning, and Mr. Panetta also publicly praised it. Then came the "anonymous U.S. officials" to provide extensive details of who conducted the raid and how. As with the bin Laden operation, the top-secret unit that carried it out was again front-page news, as were its methods and tactics.Babin noted that the work of special ops teams are highly classified for good reasons that make it illegal for military personnel to divulge details to anyone. However, President Obama and his team have opened the floodgates -- virtually every detail of the bin Laden raid was widely publicized and is now available to anyone with the click of a mouse. The Defense Secretary added to the problems when he disclosed the name of a Pakistani doctor who was key to discovering the whereabouts of bin Laden. That doctor is now is a Pakistani prison and Panetta's disclosure will undoubtedly make his life worse.These disclosures endanger lives and will make future operations that much riskier. Babin, who has put his life at stake numerous times in battle, knows the game being played with him and his fellow soldiers serving the roles of pawns in a political farce: It is infuriating to see political gain put above the safety and security of our brave warriors and our long-term strategic goals. Loose lips sink ships.Babin, as noted above, is not the only observer to question Obama's priorities.J.D. Gordon, a retired navy commander, writes in the Washington Times about Obama's deadly new PR firm:The dramatic rescue of an American aid worker and her Danish colleague in Somalia by Navy commandos was a terrific encore to the killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan nine months ago. However, all the White House-driven publicity for both events has helped turn the once-secret SEAL Team 6 into a household term, with likely negative consequences...The military still avoids discussion of the unit and its highly classified missions...The one and only reason why there has been so much recent publicity on SEAL Team 6 rests with the commander in chief.Casting aside decades of careful leadership to keep these stealth warriors out of the public eye, away from would-be revenge-seekers and assorted far-left protesters, Mr. Obama has discussed their exploits to such an extent that their mystique is largely diminished - and their identities closer to being disclosed.Gordon sharpened his focus and characterizes Obama's unwanted publicizing of Navy Seals missions for what it is: a political ploy:The first problem with Mr. Obama singling out our elite units is that they all live and train somewhere. High-profile discussions draw more attention to them personally, their families, their bases and their local communities. That presents force-protection concerns in our open society, where the Sept. 11 hijackers lived freely and the "Occupy" protesters have run amok.But, of course, the exploitation get worse. Obama is allowing his Hollywood donors to coin a profit from the heroic bin Laden mission the Seals undertook. Obama supporters in Hollywood are rushing to make a film about the raid originally scheduled to be released one month before the election. Apparently, the administration is greasing the way for the people behind the film/campaign spot to have high-level access to speed along the production.Congressman Peter King, chairman of the House Security Committee, has called for an investigation, as Caroline May of the Daily Caller has noted:The chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee has called for an investigation into reports that the Obama administration is granting Sony Pictures and director Kathryn Bigelow "high-level access" for a film about the Navy SEAL operation which killed Osama Bin Laden. The movie is scheduled for release one month before the 2012 presidential election. By the time it hits the screen, will Obama be portrayed as a heroic commander-in-chief in the way that John F. Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower were? Hollywood is one creative town.New York Republican Rep. Peter King sent a letter Tuesday to Defense Department Inspector General Gordon Heddell and CIA Inspector General David Buckley, expressing his concern about declassifying sensitive information for pure entertainment.Obama is masking with photo-ops the fact that he is eviscerating our military to fund programs that reward his base. Obama has previously defined politics as all about rewarding friends and punishing enemies. He has been sending hundreds of billions of dollars to his base (government workers, crony capitalists, environmentalists -- the list goes on and on) while slashing funds for our military. He rewards his friends in Hollywood by using the powers of his office to aid them in producing a film that will undoubtedly reflect well on him. Cleverly, the Hollywood cast of characters behind this film do not even have to declare the millions spent on this film as a campaign contribution. Barack Obama is cynically using our soldiers as political props for his campaign.When the Commander-in-Chief exploits the heroic work of our military he not only degrades the office but endangers the lives of our soldiers.This is a dereliction of duty on his part-and he should suffer the political equivalent of a court martial come November.Read the full story here.

• Canada Expels Two More Russians in Spy Scandal.(RN).Two more Russian diplomats have quit Canada following the arrest of a Canadian sailor charged in January with handing over secrets to a foreign power, the Globe and Mail newspaper reported.Dmitry Gerasimov, a consular officer with the Russian government’s office in Toronto, left in a routine posting change, the Russian embassy in Toronto said on Monday. The Russia’s defense attache in Ottawa, Colonel Sergey Zhukov, moved back to Moscow in a “normal rotation,” a Russian embassy official said.But the Globe and Mail reported yesterday that Canada had removed Gerasimov and Zhukov from the list of envoys recognized by the government.Canadian naval intelligence officer Sub-Lieutenant Jeffrey Paul Delisle was charged with giving classified information to a “foreign entity” between July 2007 and January this year. Local media reported that the entity was Russia.Delisle may face life in prison if convicted.Four other Russian embassy staff have left Canada in recent months but Russia’s Foreign Ministry denied their departures were linked with the spy controversy.Read the full story here.

• IAEA inspectors to return to Iran after 'good' trip.(JPost).VIENNA - The UN nuclear watchdog said on Wednesday it had held "good" talks in Iran about suspicions Tehran was seeking atomic weapons but more discussions were needed.The senior United Nations nuclear inspectors went to Tehran on Saturday for talks with Iranian officials on the Islamic state's suspected atomic weapons program, and to try to advance efforts to resolve the nuclear row. Tehran say its nuclear activities are for peaceful electricity generation."We are committed to resolving all the outstanding issues and the Iranians certainly are committed too. But of course there is still a lot of work to be done and so we have planned another trip in the very near future," Herman Nackaerts, deputy director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told reporters after returning from Tehran.Asked if he was satisfied with the talks, Nackaerts, who headed the six-member IAEA mission, said "Yeah, we had a good trip."He described the three days of talks as "intensive discussions" but declined to comment on whether his Iranian counterparts had engaged in substantial dialogue or to give any more details, saying he first needed to brief his superiors.Iran earlier described the talks as "constructive" and said further meetings were planned.Read the full story here.

• U.S. Intelligence Agencies Pushing Iran's U.S. Terrorist Attack Plot Propaganda.(WashingtonPost).U.S. intelligence agencies believe that Iran is prepared to launch terrorist attacks inside the United States in response to perceived threats from America and its allies, the U.S. spy chief said Tuesday.Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. said in prepared testimony that an alleged Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington that was uncovered last year reflects an aggressive new willingness within the upper ranks of the Islamist republic to authorize attacks against the United States.Highlights from a series of potentially volatile incidents. That plot “shows that some Iranian officials — probably including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei — have changed their calculus and are now more willing to conduct an attack in the United States in response to real or perceived U.S. actions that threaten the regime,” Clapper said in the testimony, which was submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee in advance of a threat assessment hearing Tuesday. “We are also concerned about Iranian plotting against U.S. or allied interests overseas.”The assessment signals a potentially dire new direction in the adversarial relationship between the United States and Iran, at a time when there are indications that a covert campaign is already underway to thwart Iran’s alleged ambition to develop a nuclear weapon.Clapper’s warning about Iran was delivered as part of the U.S. intelligence community’s annual overview of the nation’s most serious national security concerns. As the hearing got underway, Clapper signaled that the United States is seeking to avoid a violent confrontation with Iran, instead pushing for more and more sanctions while also monitoring the possibility of a preemptive strike by Israel.Read the full story here.

• Iranian FM: We Are In “Constant Contact” With Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.(Egypt Independent) — Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood maintain close contact, Iran’s foreign minister has said in an interview with Al-Masry Al-Youm.“Tehran is in constant contact with the Muslim Brotherhood,” said Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi.He said Iran is ready to promote its diplomatic relations with Egypt to the ambassadorial level, paricularly in light of the Muslim Brotherhood’s recent ascendancy to power. The group’s party, the Freedom and Justice Party, controls 43 percent of parliamentary seats.Salehi told the paper that Iran would immediately send an ambassador to Cairo if Egypt agreed.Some countries “are not happy about improving relations between Egypt and Iran,” he said, adding that if Egypt, Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia cooperated, all would benefit.Hmmmm.......probably trough the same person Obama uses to talk with the Taliban: Muslim Brotherhood leader Sheikh Youssef Qaradawi.Read the full story here.

• US foresees May as tentative date for clash with Iran. Floating SEALs base for Gulf.(Debka).A hurried decision not to de-commission the USS Ponce helicopter marine carrier after duty in Libya - but to refit it for deployment by May in the Persian Gulf as a floating base for commando teams - was confirmed by the US Pentagon and Navy Sunday, Dec. 29. This transportable floating base will expand the commandos' range in coastal areas and support counter-measure against mines which Iran has threatened to plant in the Strait of Hormuz in reprisal for the US-EU oil embargo. The SEALs will also take on Iran's menacing fleet of military speedboats.debkafile reports Tehran operates four different kinds of these craft in the Persian Gulf:

1. Small, fast vessels, each armed with a small missile for striking tankers and coastal oil targets around the Gulf region, such as export terminals. Earlier this month, Tehran claimed to have developed stealth cruise missiles capable of disabling aircraft carriers with a single shot.
2. Small, extra-fast boats armed with torpedoes. Iranian publications claim several such boats are capable of stealing up on US aircraft carriers and large warships from several directions without being detected and cause serious damage.
3. Floating bombs for kamikaze missions. These fast boats cannot be deflected after locking in on target, whether on sea or shore, and explode on contact.Iran used these floating missiles piloted by suicide squads to attack oil tankers in the Gulf in November 1987. Since then, their naval tacticians have upgraded this fleet with the technology gained from the British Bladerunner 51, a model of which Iran purchased some years ago.Since early January, the Pentagon has reported four cases of harassment by Iranian military boats sailing close to American warships in the Persian Gulf.
4. Boats carrying teams of Iranian marine frogmen trained for secret suicide underwater missions: One member of the boat's three-man crew dives close to the targeted ship and attaches a magnetic bomb to its hull.Iran has scattered hundreds of speedboats of different types around uninhabited islands off the Iranian mainland, tucking them out of sight in well-hidden inlets and bays. The US commando teams based on the Ponce platform will have the task of ferreting out and destroying this fleet.The US Defense Department aims to get the Ponce ready for its new mission as a floating commando base with all possible speed. To save time, the US military published one no-bid contract for the engineering work, waiving normal procurement rules on the grounds that any delay presented a "national security risk."The contract carries pointers to the timeline expected in Washington for a military confrontation to erupt between the United States and Iran, as well as the form it may take, say debkafile's military sources.The target date for deploying the commando platform in the Persian Gulf in four or five months indicates Washington is preparing for military clashes to blow up with Iran in the late spring or early summer.Read the full story here.

• US Official: U.S. Maintains Full Control of Turkish-Based Radar – facing wrong direction to help Israel.(DefenceNews).TEL AVIV — Refuting reports from Ankara, a U.S. government official said a U.S. X-band radar deployed in eastern Turkey as part of NATO’S ballistic missile defense shield is operated solely by American personnel, with no restrictions on the use of data generated by the powerful early warning sensor.“That radar is exclusively operated by U.S. personnel, exactly as it is here. We will control the data and fuse it with data from other radars in the region to generate the most comprehensive and effective missile defense picture,” the U.S. official said of the AN/TPY-2 radar recently deployed at Turkey’s Kurecik Air Force base and a twin system operating in Israel’s Negev desert.But the official vigorously denied Turkish reports of preconditions imposed by Ankara restricting the sharing of radar data with non-NATO nations, particularly Israel.“There are some people in Turkey that did not want the radar. They argued that the reason we’re putting the radar in there is to help Israel. Well, that’s not why we’re doing it.”According to the U.S. official, the Turkish-deployed radar is facing the wrong direction to be of much help to Israel.“In fact, the opposite is really true. Our radar here in Israel helps Turkey. ... Bottom line, it’s in all of our interests to have an American radar 400 kilometers from the Iranian border,” he said.Read the full story here.

• Turkey's Erdoğan tells Paul Auster'Who cares?'(HurriyetDaily).Turkey’s prime minister responded today to criticism from American novelist Paul Auster over the number of jailed journalists in the country, saying it made no difference whether he came to Turkey or not, daily Hürriyet reported. "Writer Paul Auster told a newspaper over the weekend that he wouldn't come to countries that lack democratic laws," Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said. "What difference does it make if you come to Turkey, or if you don't?"Auster had said earlier this week that he refused to visit Turkey because of the number of journalists and writers that had been jailed in the country. Read the full story here.

• Russia, China oppose ‘forced regime change’ in Syria; Lavrov warns of ‘bigger drama’.(AlArabiya).China and Russia have reiterated their opposition to the use of force to resolve the crisis in Syria, where escalating violence has killed thousands of civilians who oppose President Bashar al-Assad. As many as 25 people have been killed by the fire of Syrian security forces across the country on Wednesday, Al Arabiya reported, citing Syrian activists. 39 people were reported to have been killed on Tuesday.Russia’s envoy to the European Union said on Wednesday he believes a Western-Arab draft U.N. Security Council resolution cannot pass without language clearly ruling out potential military intervention, the Interfax news agency reported.Vladimir Chizhov’s remarks were the latest indication that Russia could veto the resolution, which supports an Arab League plan calling for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to cede power, if it is not changed to take Moscow’s concerns into account.The draft “is missing the most important thing: a clear clause ruling out the possibility that the resolution could be used to justify military intervention in Syrian affairs from outside. For this reason I see no chance this draft could be adopted,” Chizhov said, according to Interfax.Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said they would not support any action that would be imposed on Syria and would avoid taking sides in an internal conflict, according to Reuters. “The international community unfortunately did take sides in Libya and we would never allow the Security Council to authorize anything similar to what happened in Libya,” Lavrov said in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.In Washington, U.S. intelligence chief James Clapper said the fall of the Assad regime was in any case inevitable.“I do not see how he can sustain his rule of Syria,” Clapper told senators. “I personally believe it's a question of time but that's the issue, it could be a long time.”The opposition Syrian National Council meanwhile deplored the international community’s lack of “swift action” to protect civilians “by all necessary means,” in a statement on Facebook.On Monday alone, almost 100 people, including 55 civilians, were killed during a regime assault on the flashpoint city of Homs, said the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights.The rebel Free Syrian Army said half of the country was now effectively a no-go zone for the security forces.“Fifty percent of Syrian territory is no longer under the control of the regime,” its Turkey-based commander Colonel Riyadh al-Asaad told AFP.CIA director David Petraeus told senators in Washington that Assad now faced challenges in Damascus and Aleppo, two cities that had been seen as insulated from the unrest.“I think it has shown indeed how substantial the opposition to the regime is and how it is in fact growing and how increasing areas are becoming beyond the reach of the regime security forces,” Petraeus said. Read the full story here.

• Why Are the Chinese Buying Record Quantities of Gold?(Forbes).This month, the Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department reported that China imported 102,779 kilograms of gold from Hong Kong in November, an increase from October’s 86,299 kilograms. Beijing does not release gold trade figures, so for this and other reasons the Hong Kong numbers are considered the best indication of China’s gold imports.Analysts believe China bought as much as 490 tons of gold in 2011, double the estimated 245 tons in 2010. “The thing that’s caught people’s minds is the massive increase in Chinese buying,” remarked Ross Norman of Sharps Pixley, a London gold brokerage, this month.So who in China is buying all this gold?The People’s Bank of China, the central bank, has been hinting that it is purchasing. “No asset is safe now,” said the PBOC’s Zhang Jianhua at the end of last month. “The only choice to hedge risks is to hold hard currency—gold.” He also said it was smart strategy to buy on market dips. Analysts naturally jumped on his comment as proof that China, the world’s fifth-largest holder of the metal, is in the market for more.There are a few problems with this conclusion. First, the Chinese government rarely benefits others—and hurts itself—by telegraphing its short-term investment strategies.Hmmmm.......Someone trying to replace the Dollar as world currency?Read the full story here

• Turkey - Main opposition leader slams Prime Minister Erdoğan : ‘You are no pious man’.(HurriyetDaily).Main opposition leader Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu yesterday leveled harsh accusations against Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for exploiting people’s religious feelings, as he attacked the government for covering up a high-profile embezzlement probe into an Islamic charity.“You are not a pious man but a religion-monger. Before categorizing people as pious and not pious you should first hold to account those who got away with the money that people donated for the poor,” Kılıçdaroğlu said yesterday at the parliamentary group meeting of his Republican People’s Party (CHP).His outburst came in response to Erdoğan’s accusations that the CHP was annoyed by the existence of the imam-hatip religious schools and suggested the main opposition aspired for “a less-religious generation.” Erdoğan made the remarks after two CHP deputies asked the Council of State to scrap a regulation that put graduates of imam-hatip religious schools on equal par with others at university entrance exams.Slamming Erdoğan’s comments as “divisive,” Kılıçdaroğlu said, “Was the previous generation unreligious? How do you measure people’s religiousness?” He recalled that imam-hatip schools and divinity faculties were inaugurated under CHP rule.He renewed criticism of the indictment of three prosecutors who were removed from the embezzlement probe into the Deniz Feneri (Lighthouse) charity last year on charges of forgery in official documents and abuse of office that carry up to 11 years in jail.“They first took the prime minister’s friends from the grip of the prosecutors, but that did not suffice. The prosecutors are after the embezzlers, while the ministers are after the prosecutors. This is an open intimidation of the judicial community,” Kılıçdaroğlu said. Read the full story here.

• Should Turkey embrace Hamas as a ‘civilian’ party?(HurriyetDaily).By Yusuf Kanli.Turkish Foreign Ministry sources have “corrected” charges made by Israeli President Shimon Peres and a leading Israeli newspaper by declaring that the amount of Turkish funding to Hamas would not be anything close to the quoted “$300 million.”This is good news, and of course bad news. On the good side, Turkey was not making such a “huge contribution” to Hamas, while on the bad side the statement revealed that, if not at the level of $300 million, Turkey was still providing some funding to Hamas.Is Hamas not a terrorist organization? Excluding some Arab countries and Turkey’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) (but including the Turkish state), the entire international community of nations say it clearly: As long as Hamas does not denounce terrorism, lay down arms and opt to become a “civilian” political party, it will remain a terrorist organization and will be treated as such.The president said allowing Hamas to have a bureau in Turkey was an issue that must be handled later. What does that mean? He did not say “Hamas wanted to have a bureau in Turkey.” He just said it was not the time to make a decision on the issue. That is a between-the-lines confirmation that such things are being considered.Furthermore, the president stressed that Hamas was a “political formation” of Gaza that had entered and won elections. Yet what dimensions Turkey’s relations with Hamas would take would be seen in time.Was Turkey not recognizing the official Palestinian government? Was Turkey not considering the Palestinian Liberation Organization as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people? Had Hamas not very recently joined the PLO?Embracing Hamas to the extent of letting it move its HQ to Turkey would mean intentionally placing ourselves in far deeper difficulties than we could ever imagine.Read the full story here.

• Egypt’s Christians want political party.(BM).CAIRO: A number of Coptic Christian activists said on Tuesday that they agreed on the need for the establishment of an independent political Coptic Council away from the influence of the Coptic Church, pointing to the continued policy of marginalization of the Coptic community in Egypt, especially after the revolution, and described their situation as “no different from the era of Mubarak.”The activists added that their situation is “even worse under the rule of the military junta.”The activist demanded, during a conference on the “situation and state of Copts after the revolution,” freedom from the grip of the Church, which,according to them, fell in the “trap of the military council and continued its wrong path in political life and caused the election to turn into a sectarian issue.”Head of the General Coptic Association, Sherif Doss, stressed that the political situation is the “same as it was before the revolution, as the state did not take any action towards the incidents and violations against the Copts.”Prominent activist Naguib Gobraiel said “Copts must unite in one party, as the military junta did not offer anything for the Copts.”He added that “We [Copts] shall make the Party a political bloc, not religious.”Hmmmm.......Read the full story here.

GOP Video: “Interesting”

Taliban will rule Afghanistan again, says leaked US military report

Taliban will rule Afghanistan again, says leaked US military report.(UK Guardian).
The Taliban, backed by Pakistan, are set to retake control of Afghanistan after Nato-led forces withdraw from the country, according to reports citing a classifed assessment by US forces.
The Times described the report as secret and “highly classified”, saying it was put together by the US military at Bagram air base in Afghanistan for top Nato officers last month. The BBC also carried a report on the leaked document.
“Many Afghans are already bracing themselves for an eventual return of the Taliban,” the report was quoted as saying. “Once Isaf (Nato-led forces) is no longer a factor, Taliban consider their victory inevitable.”
The document stated that Pakistan’s security agency was helping the Taliban in directing attacks against foreign forces – a charge long denied by Islamabad.
The findings were based on interrogations of more than 4,000 Taliban and al-Qaida detainees, the Times said, adding the document was scarce on identifying individual insurgents.
A US state department spokesman and Britain’s Foreign Office both declined comment on the report. Nato and Pakistani officials could not be immediately reached for comment.
Despite the presence of more than 100,000 foreign troops, the UN has said violence in Afghanistan is at its worst since the Taliban were ousted by US-backed forces in 2001.
The Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) says levels of violence are falling.
Citing the same report, the BBC reported on its website that Pakistan and its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency knew the locations of senior Taliban leaders and supported the expulsion of “foreign invaders from Afghanistan”.
“Senior Taliban leaders meet regularly with ISI personnel, who advise on strategy and relay any pertinent concerns of the government of Pakistan.”
The Times said the document suggested the Taliban were gaining in popularity, partly because the severe Islamist movement was becoming more tolerant.The report was quoted as stating: “It remains to be seen whether a revitalised, more progressive Taliban will endure if they continue to gain power and popularity. Regardless, at least within the Taliban the refurbished image is already having a positive effect on morale.”Hmmmm........Obama: If We Work Hard, Afghanistan Could Be a Success...Like Iraq!Yup starts to look like it.Read the full story here.

Monsanto files patent for new 'invention': The Pig !

Monsanto files patent for new 'invention': The Pig !(GreenPeace).It's official. Monsanto Corporation is out to own the world's food supply, the dangers of genetic engineering and reduced biodiversity notwithstanding, as they pig-headedly set about hog-tying farmers with their monopoly plans. We've discovered chilling new evidence of this in recent patents that seek to establish ownership rights over pigs and their offspring.

In the crop department, Monsanto is well on their way to dictating what consumers will eat, what farmers will grow, and how much Monsanto will get paid for seeds. In some cases those seeds are designed not to reproduce sowable offspring. In others, a flock of lawyers stand ready to swoop down on farmers who illegally, or even unknowingly, end up with Monsanto's private property growing in their fields.

Oneway or another, Monsanto wants to make sure no food is grown that they don't own -- and the record shows they don't care if it's safe for the environment or not. Monsanto has aggressively set out to bulldoze environmental concerns about its genetically engineered (GE) seeds at every regulatory level.
So why stop in the field? Not content to own the pesticide and the herbicide and the crop, they've made a move on the barnyard by filing two patents which would make the corporate giant the sole owner of that famous Monsanto invention: the pig.

The Monsanto Pig (Patent pending)

The patent applications were published in February 2005 at the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) in Geneva. A Greenpeace researcher who monitors patent applications, Christoph Then, uncovered the fact that Monsanto is seeking patents not only on methods of breeding, but on actual breeding herds of pigs as well as the offspring that result.

"If these patents are granted, Monsanto can legally prevent breeders and farmers from breeding pigs whose characteristics are described in the patent claims, or force them to pay royalties," says Then. "It's a first step toward the same kind of corporate control of an animal line that Monsanto is aggressively pursuing with various grain and vegetable lines."
There are more than 160 countries and territories mentioned where the patent is sought including Europe, the Russian Federation, Asia (India, China, Philippines) America (USA, Brazil, Mexico), Australia and New Zealand. WIPO itself can only receive applications, not grant patents. The applications are forwarded to regional patent offices.
The patents are based on simple procedures, but are incredibly broad in their claims.

In one application (WO 2005/015989 to be precise) Monsanto is describing very general methods of crossbreeding and selection, using artificial insemination and other breeding methods which are already in use. The main "invention" is nothing more than a particular combination of these elements designed to speed up the breeding cycle for selected traits, in order to make the animals more commercially profitable. (Monsanto chirps gleefully about lower fat content and higher nutritional value. But we've looked and we couldn't find any "Philanthropic altruism" line item in their annual reports, despite the fact that it's an omnipresent factor in their advertising.)

According to Then, "I couldn't believe this. I've been reviewing patents for 10 years and I had to read this three times. Monsanto isn't just seeking a patent for the method, they are seeking a patent on the actual pigs which are bred from this method. It's an astoundingly broad and dangerous claim."
By claiming global monopoly patent rights throughout the entire food chain, Monsanto seeks to make farmers and food producers, and ultimately consumers, entirely dependent and reliant on one single corporate entity for a basic human need. It's the same dependence that Russian peasants had on the Soviet Government following the Russian revolution. The same dependence that French peasants had on Feudal kings during the middle ages. But control of a significant proportion of the global food supply by a single corporation would be unprecedented in human history.Read the full story here.